Of course, there's a flexibility trade-off there and, I would expect, an impact to quality.
This is simple and straightforward, only uses one cable, and means I'm not messing around setting recording levels and so on. Rather than going though another DAC->ADC cycle, I'm just taking the S/PDIF output straight off the Linn and into the digital input on a little Tascam DR-100MkII. This has a pretty nice built-in MM/MC switchable phono-stage and, like all the analog inputs on the unit, it feeds straight into a very solid internal ADC, and then it applies the RIAA EQ in the digital domain. I'm using my turntable with a Linn Akurate DSM/1. So far I've been more than pleasantly surprised. Were I to do it again I think I would get the Hilo as I think it's flexibility is unmatched by anything else on the market.Īs I'm getting ever-more-rapidly sucked back into vinyl, I decided to actually try a few needle drops - just to see how good the results were (and to get past my more-FOMO-like paranoia about wanting to buy both a CD and vinyl version of each album for both quality/convenience purposes). I like my TASCAM DA-3000 a lot but I never use the DSD functionality and going back and forth to swap out SD cards gets tiresome. I've listening a lot and IMO with my settings the false positive rate is somewhere between very very low and non existent.įor anything electronic where you could get something resembling a square waveform or music that intentionally has noise inserted I would strongly avoid auto-declick and do it manually. I prefer it to iZotope RX declick for everything except badly damaged records (goldmine G or G-).ĭeclick Strength: 1 Decrackle: Off Wavelet: On Pitch Protection: On Reverse: Onįor acoustic music I think auto declick is OK.
#Clickrepair portable installation software
For vinyl rips I find iZotope RX is the best processing software by a significant margin.Ĭlick Repair is my go to choice for declick. Quality of processing and algorithms it comes in dead last. It's free but that's about all it's got going for it.
0 kommentar(er)
